Such expressions of solidarity-via-identification have an honorable history in political discourse.At its core, then, this book argues that the category of the implicated subject can help us conceptualize and confront both the legacies of violent histories and the sociopolitical dynamics that create suffering and inequality in the present. Exploring implication is a messy business, and the form of the serial project allows these artists to grapple with several things: historical change, the possibility of political error and the consequent need for recalibration, and the difficulty of unseating entrenched powers of state and capital.Such a framing also risks keeping the concerns of white people at the center of attention instead of offering a space for people of color to share their experiences. Das Vorbild My desire to confront what I would eventually call implication did not arise only from reflection on what it means to be white in a society still shaped by settler colonialism and the aftermaths of slavery.This book contests the individualizing and reifying nature of this categorization even as it recognizes the usefulness of those categories in certain circumstances and for certain purposes.
Focusing on the position of the implicated subject allows us to address these different scales and temporalities of injustice.Nor is the case of diasporic implication in long-distance nationalism (of the sort that I explore in relation to Israel in Chapter 5) best described through the category of the beneficiary, although, again, the category is not wholly irrelevant, either. See Berber Bevernage, History, Memory, and State-Sponsored Violence (New York: Routledge, 2012).Yet, the chapter concludes, such solidarity comes with its own pitfalls that also deserve critical exploration. Kambodscha New York: Fordham UP, 2000.Drawing on these diverse sources, the chapter formulates a theory of implication and the implicated subject that offers an alternative to the usual accounts of human rights violations and their aftermaths.
The victim-perpetrator-bystander categorization derives from Holocaust studies but has a more extended influence in popular understandings of trauma and violence.While drawing on a global range of histories and texts, the book never loses focus on the contemporary moment. Its stakes are as high as its thinking is subtle, clear, and persuasive.In contrast, focus on the beneficiary can illuminate the nexus of past and present modes of implication and signal the need to resist closing the books on the past, instead keeping open questions of social justice. Werk C Arguing that the familiar categories of victim, perpetrator, and bystander do not adequately account for our connection to injustices past and present, Michael Rothberg offers a new theory of political responsibility through the figure of the implicated subject.Used under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.